A- de 2011
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice María Victoria Calle Correa
✓Claimant Oscar Raul Ivan Florez Chavez·Respondent Sin Información
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Procedencia dentro del término de ejecutoria, de oficio o a solicitud de parte respecto de conceptos o frases contenidas en la parte resolutiva o que influyan en ella
- Denegar solicitud de aclaración en sentencia T-1012/10 por pretender reabrir debate
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Solicitud de Aclaración sentencia.
El memorialista afirma que en la sentencia de la referencia existen eventuales vacíos que surgen entre la motivación de la decisión y su resolución, los cuales influyen en el entendimiento y cumplimiento de lo decidido.
La Sala DENIEGA la solicitud de aclaración impetrada, por encontrarla improcedente.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. DENEGAR la solicitud de aclaracion formulada por Oscar Raul Ivan Florez Chavez.
- Segundo. INFORMAR al senor Oscar Raul Ivan Florez Chavez, que contra el presente auto no procede recurso alguno.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.